Belgian Criminal Court Fines Yahoo for Non-Disclosure of Personal Data to Public Prosecutor
Time 2 Minute Read

On 2 March 2009, a Belgian Criminal court (Tribunal correctionnel de Termonde, No. DE 20.95.16/08/25) fined Yahoo! Inc., €55,000 ($71,745) for refusing to disclose to a Belgian Public Prosecutor the personal data of its e-mail users who were under criminal investigation for fraud. The Criminal court also imposed a daily penalty fee of €10,000 ($13,045) in a case of non-compliance with the judgment.  This decision was reached despite Yahoo!’s argument that Belgian law did not apply because the company does not maintain a legal entity in Belgium and does not store any customer data in Belgium.

In the context of a criminal investigation for fraud, the Belgian Public Prosecutor of Termonde had requested the disclosure of detailed account information to identify e-mail users using pseudonyms on their Yahoo! email accounts.  Yahoo! refused to disclose such information. The Belgian Criminal court held that Yahoo! had violated Article 46bis of Belgian Code of Criminal Procedure (Code d’instruction criminelle), which imposes on electronic communication service providers a duty to cooperate with a Public Prosecutor and to provide the identity of their users when requested by a Public Prosecutor in the course of a criminal investigation.

As mentioned above, Yahoo! argued that Belgian law did not apply because there is not a Yahoo! legal entity in Belgium and Yahoo! does not store any customer data in Belgium. Furthermore, Yahoo! argued that the Belgian Public Prosecutor had failed to issue a formal request in accordance with the procedures established by the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance on Criminal Matters, signed between the United States and Belgium on 1 January 2000. Following the ruling, Yahoo! appealed the judgment of the Criminal court on 3 March 2009.
 

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On November 6, 2024, a Texas state district court jury found that a large e-discovery vendor violated Title 7, Chapter 33 of the Texas Penal Code, which provides that accessing a computer without its owner’s permission is a Class B misdemeanor. This case highlights the importance for e-discovery vendors of considering data privacy and security requirements in the course of discovery proceedings.

Time 4 Minute Read

On March 7, 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued its judgment in the case of IAB Europe (Case C‑604/22). In this judgment, the CJEU assessed the role of the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe (“IAB Europe”) in the processing operations associated with its Transparency and Consent Framework (“TCF”) and further developed CJEU case law on the concept of personal data under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”).

Time 2 Minute Read

On January 11, 2023, the Belgian Data Protection Authority (“Belgian DPA”) announced that it has approved the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe’s (“IAB Europe”) action plan with respect to its Transparency and Consent Framework (“TCF”).

Time 2 Minute Read

On October 25, 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ” or the “Department”) announced that Google had entered into an agreement to resolve a dispute over the loss of data responsive to a search warrant issued in 2016.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Archives

Jump to Page