• Posts by Susan F. Wiltsie
    Posts by Susan F. Wiltsie
    Partner

    Susan focuses her practice on labor, employment, and OSHA compliance, defense, and crisis response. She provides comprehensive OSHA representation of employers across all industry sectors. She has counseled and defended ...

Time 14 Minute Read

On September 15, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the US Environmental Protection Agency’s risk management rule for methylene chloride, a widely used solvent, under the Toxic Substances Control Act. East Fork Enterprises, Inc. v. EPA, Nos. 24-60227 & 24-60256 (5th Cir. 2026). The rule prohibited 40 uses of methylene chloride and imposed numerous workplace requirements on the remaining 13 industrial and commercial uses, including exposure monitoring and an existing chemical exposure limit roughly ten times more stringent than OSHA’s standards. After a ten-year process of EPA evaluating extensive data on methylene chloride, publishing and then revising a determination that the substance presents an unreasonable risk to human health, and imposing bans on a majority of uses of the substance, including industrial uses and uses in finished products, the Fifth Circuit scrapped the rule, finding EPA exceeded its statutory authority and lacked sufficient evidence to support its rule.

Time 1 Minute Read

The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently published Guidance for Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19 (Guidance), outlining steps employers can take to help protect their workforce. The Guidance focuses on the need for employers to implement engineering, administrative, work practice controls and personal protective equipment (PPE), as well as considerations for doing so. While there is no specific OSHA standard covering infectious disease or COVID-19 in particular, some OSHA requirements may apply to preventing occupational exposure to the virus including OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.20) Personal Protective Equipment (29 CFR 1910 Subpart I) Hazard Communication (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) and Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (29 C.F.R. § 1904). Also, the General Duty Clause of OSHA which requires employers to provide a “place of employment . . . free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm.”

Time 5 Minute Read

The effects of the regulatory reform initiatives of the Trump Administration are beginning to be felt at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with the formal action by OSHA to finalize withdrawal of the “Volks Rule” regulation. On May 3, 2017, in response to a CRA resolution of disapproval, OSHA published a final rule removing amendments to OSHA’s recordkeeping regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page