An Uncharted Frontier: Nevada First State to Prohibit Defense-Within-Limits Provisions
Time 3 Minute Read

Nevada recently became the first state to prohibit defense-within-limits provisions in liability insurance policies. Defense-within-limits provisions—resulting in what’s called “eroding” or “wasting” policies—reduce the policy’s applicable limit of insurance by amounts the insurer pays to defend the policyholder against a claim or suit. These provisions are commonly included in errors and omissions (E&O), directors and officers (D&O) and other management liability policies. This is in contrast to other policies, most commonly commercial general liability policies, which provide defense “outside of limits” where defense costs do not reduce the policy’s limit. 

Nevada’s new law, which goes into effect on October 1, 2023, amends Chapter 679A to add the following new section:

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an insurer, including, without limitation, an insurer listed in NRS 679A.160, shall not issue or renew a policy of liability insurance that contains a provision that:

  1. Reduces the limit of liability stated in the policy by the costs of defense, legal costs and fees and other expenses for claims; or
  2. Otherwise limits the availability of coverage for the costs of defense, legal costs and fees and other expenses for claims.

The law applies to insurers that transact the business of insurance in Nevada and issue liability insurance products for Nevada residents. The new law does not apply to any insurance policies existing on October 1, 2023, but it applies to the renewal of any such policies. 

Prohibiting defense-within-limits provisions may be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the provisions preserve coverage for settlements and judgments because costly litigation will not reduce the policy’s limits. On the other hand, where a policy’s limits are not reduced by defense costs, it could lessen the incentive for claimants to settle early in litigation to avoid the risk of eroding liability limits by defense costs. The incentive for claimants and policyholders to settle early is heightened when the exposure to the policyholder exceeds the policy limit. Removing this shared goal of avoiding protracted litigation may drive up costs of defense even more if there are fewer settlements or if settlements are reached later in the litigation. 

The new law also creates uncertainty in the insurance marketplace. Nevada policyholders may see increases in premiums and other changes to the structure of their liability insurance products to mitigate the increased risk to insurers because of the new law. Insurers may even be less likely to offer E&O, D&O and other liability insurance products to Nevada policyholders. Some commentators have predicted that certain insurers will withdraw from the Nevada marketplace entirely.

Nevada policyholders should be aware of the new law and its potential effect on them. Experienced coverage counsel can assist with navigating this new frontier for Nevada policyholders.

  • Partner

    Geoff works closely with corporate policyholders and their directors and officers to resolve high-stakes insurance disputes. He leads the firm’s directors and officers (D&O) insurance and executive protection practice.

    As a ...

  • Associate

    A former judicial law clerk with experience in federal and state courts, Andrew helps policyholders maximize their insurance recoveries in complex insurance disputes. He also helps clients with civil litigation matters and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

Colleges and universities have long sat at the crossroads of freedom of expression and societal change. As campus activism surges, they face growing pressure to protect their institutional missions while upholding students’ individual rights in an era of heightened scrutiny.

Time 4 Minute Read

In a recent opinion addressing cross‑motions for summary judgment, a Pennsylvania state court set forth a clear holding that policyholders may recover post-judgment interest under excess liability insurance policies only when the policy language expressly says so—and only when the stated conditions are met. The decision underscores the importance for policyholders to thoroughly examine the defense and payment provisions outlined in their insurance policies.

Time 1 Minute Read

If recent years have taught insurance practitioners anything, it is that the most consequential coverage disputes rarely turn on novelty alone. In 2025, courts continued to resolve high‑stakes insurance disputes by returning to first principles—examining when claims are related, how losses and occurrences are defined and aggregated, and how policy language allocates risk across time and conduct. D&O coverage and other core insurance law issues again occupied center stage, while decisions in property, cyber, and liability disputes reinforced a familiar theme: policy interpretation remains the decisive factor in determining whether coverage is available in an increasingly complex claims environment. As the decisions discussed below demonstrate, 2025 confirmed that even as risks evolve, coverage disputes remain grounded in careful, policy‑specific analysis.

Time 5 Minute Read

Directors and officers liability insurance is first and foremost protection against personal exposure of boards and management who are targeted in claims challenging their decisions in running the company. That’s why it is surprising how often dedicated “Side A” coverage—insurance coverage, subject to no self-insured retention, available exclusively for the benefit of directors and officers who are not indemnified by the company—is overlooked in placing and renewing D&O insurance programs. One recent Texas bankruptcy ruling, In re First Brands Group, LLC, No. 25-90399 (CML) (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2026), demonstrates just how powerful Side A protection can be. There, against strong objections from the creditors’ committee, the bankruptcy court granted motions by numerous former executives seeking relief from the automatic stay to recover D&O insurance proceeds, unlocking millions in Side A coverage to defend against private and governmental claims asserted in connection with the bankruptcy.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page