Virginia Enacts “Ban the Box” Legislation for Marijuana Possession Arrests, Charges, and Convictions
Time 2 Minute Read
Virginia Enacts “Ban the Box” Legislation for Marijuana Possession Arrests, Charges, and Convictions

As we have previously reported here, here, and here, Virginia has enacted several new labor and employment laws that are poised to dramatically change the legal landscape for employers in Virginia.  In addition to the laws discussed above, Virginia has also enacted “ban the box” legislation for simple possession of marijuana.

On May 21, 2020, Governor Ralph Northam signed a bill decriminalizing simple possession of marijuana.  Though possessing marijuana in Virginia remains unlawful, the new law only provides a civil penalty of $25.  The new law takes effect on July 1, 2020.

In addition to decriminalizing possession of marijuana, the new law prohibits employers from requiring job applicants to disclose any information regarding an arrest, criminal charge, or conviction for simple possession of marijuana, and the new law gives applicants a statutory right to refuse to answer any questions or provide any information concerning any such arrest, criminal charge, or conviction.

Though the new law does not appear to provide applicants with a private cause of action, Virginia employers are subject to criminal penalties if they willfully violate the new law.  Under the new law, any individual who willfully violates these prohibitions could be charged with a Class 1 misdemeanor for each violation—which would carry fines and possible jail time.

Given these changes—including the risk of potential criminal prosecution—employers in Virginia should review and revise their job applications and hiring practices to ensure that they do not require an applicant to disclose any arrests, criminal charges, and/or convictions for simple possession of marijuana.

  • Partner

    Ryan has a national practice focused on representing employers and executives in complex labor and employment litigation.  Ryan’s litigation experience is both broad and deep, and he is particularly skilled in defending ...

  • Counsel

    Tyler represents and advises employers on a wide range of labor and employment matters, including complex wage and hour issues, union organizing and other traditional labor matters, discrimination claims and other employment ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

“Ban-the-Box” legislation has seen steady growth throughout the country for more than two decades.  Currently, there is no federal legislation on the topic for private employers but a good number of states have limited their ability to inquire about or make decisions based on a prospective employee’s criminal background history.

Time 4 Minute Read

Earlier this year, Harris County, Texas, which encompasses a substantial majority of the City of Houston, became the sixth Texas city or county to embrace a “ban the box” policy when it adopted the Fair Chance Policy.

Time 2 Minute Read

On October 20, 2021, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”) issued a press release to announce its plans to use unspecified technology to conduct online searches for statements in job advertisements that violate the Fair Chance Act (“FCA”). According to the DFEH, during a one-day review, it was able to locate over 500 job advertisements that violated the FCA because they stated that the employer would not consider job applicants with criminal records.

Time 4 Minute Read

Uber Technologies, Inc. has been sued in a class action lawsuit alleging the company’s use of criminal background checks discriminates against Black and Latinx drivers. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 8, challenges Uber’s “unlawful use of criminal history to discriminate against its drivers in New York City as well as its brazen noncompliance with human rights and fair credit laws.”

Named plaintiff Job Golightly, a Black resident of Bronx County, New York, drove for Uber from 2014 through August 2020. Golightly claims that his criminal history consists of a single 2013 misdemeanor speeding violation from Virginia. According to the lawsuit, until 2017 Uber had relied solely on background checks conducted by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC). Plaintiffs allege that in mid-2017, in response to negative news coverage on assaults committed by drivers, Uber began using the credit reporting agency Checkr to conduct additional background checks on current and prospective drivers. As a result, in August 2020 Uber allegedly conducted a background check on Golightly that revealed his 2013 speeding violation. One day later, Golightly claims that Uber deactivated him from its platform, preventing him from driving for the company.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page